Standardization People often remark about the consistency of the hamburgers
one can get at McDonalds fast food restaurants or about the cleanliness
one witnesses these days in public places like the KL International
Airport. Think about all the situations where you would like to experience
consistent and high levels of quality like these, whether it be at an
operating theater or with an electronic appliance that you purchase.
Think also about the situations where you have been disappointed by
the quality of the service or product you have received - by the handphone
that you bought that did not work, or by the error in a key document
that caused you interminable trouble.
Underlying these situations and others similar to them, you will invariably
find the manner in which work gets done that in turn determines the
outcomes in each one of these situations. The ability to reproduce the
consistent high quality levels of a service or a product has directly
to do with the ability to develop optimum work methods or process and
equipment conditions, to codify them, to be able to translate them into
effective practices, and then to create the organizational circumstances
to gain long term adherence to these optimum methods and conditions.
This is referred to as the Framework of Standardization. Standardization
is the ability to realize in practice in the short run as well as in
the long run a set of methods and conditions that makes possible repeated
high performance.
Standardization reflects the technology level of an organization. As
problems get solved, as new uplifting conditions get discovered they
are captured in the standards of a company. This codification process
freezes these experiences of progress into the memory and long-term
capability of a company thus establishing and renewing its level of
technology. They are expressed in operating procedures, in specification
documents, in drawings, in rules, in infrastructure, in hardware of
the company, in software applications and such others.
Standardization enables a significant reduction in the variability
that is inherent in situations. It is the failure to recognize the many
possibilities for variations those results often in inadequate allocation
of resources to the job of standardization. Inadequate allocation in
terms of quantity as well as in terms of recognized areas of standardization
as in the framework of standardization.
Standardization raises the efficiencies of operations in ways recognized
and unrecognized. The establishment and operationalising of optimum
conditions and methods is a clearly recognized efficiency raising effect
of standardization. The ability to transfer techniques, processes and
practices reduces the losses that often occur when such transition occurs.
The ability to "make small big" or to proliferate single improvements
to institutionalize into larger improvements are examples of effects
of standardization that may not be explicitly recognized. The underpinning
of organizational discipline is the well-laid out standards setup.
Standardization falls into the category of unavoidable infrastructure,
given all of the above and more. Leadership within organizations needs
to understand the true role played by standards and to champion standardization
within organizations.
| To Resource
Centre | Home |